As an Upper Hutt expat now living in Australia, I followed the recent New Zealand mayoral elections—particularly Wayne Guppy’s campaign—with keen interest. Having experienced both electoral systems, I find it fascinating to compare their impact on civic engagement.

What prompted me to write was the noticeable voter apathy in New Zealand. So many eligible voters simply didn’t cast a ballot. In Australia, voting is compulsory. While some see this as authoritarian, it was introduced to ensure governments weren’t elected by only half the population yet still making laws that affect everyone.

In 1924, Australian Senator Herbert Payne proposed compulsory voting after turnout dropped below 60%. He argued that a Parliament elected by only half the voters couldn’t truly represent the will of the people or legislate in their best interest.

Looking at New Zealand’s turnout, a similar trend appears to be emerging. One wonders whether the outcome of the recent council and Mayoral elections might have been different if more people had participated. With a national election approaching, I’m sure political parties will be aiming for a significantly higher voter turnout.

It may not be the Kiwi way to compel civic action, but if you didn’t vote and dislike the result, it’s hard to justify complaints. I’m surprised the New Zealand Government hasn’t explored this issue more seriously. A higher turnout could lead to a more balanced and representative government.

Regards, Chris Barnes
Qld, Australia

A “thank you” to Chris Barnes for sending this letter to The Upper Hutt Connection.

29/10/25